Skip to content

Deno: Miller-Rabin Primality Test Allows Zero Rounds

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 27, 2026 in denoland/deno • Updated Jun 16, 2026

Package

cargo deno (Rust)

Affected versions

<= 2.8.0

Patched versions

2.8.1

Description

Summary

node:crypto.checkPrime(candidate[, options][, callback]) and crypto.checkPrimeSync(candidate[, options]) ran no Miller-Rabin rounds at all when the caller left options.checks at its default of 0. In that mode, the only test applied to the candidate was trial division by the primes up to 17,863. Any composite whose smallest prime factor exceeds that bound — for example the product of two primes just above it, such as 17,881 × 17,891 — was reported as true ("probably prime").

The same divergence affected the lower-level op_node_check_prime / op_node_check_prime_bytes paths that the polyfill calls into.

Node.js itself does not have this problem: it forwards checks = 0 to OpenSSL's BN_check_prime, which substitutes a sensible default number of rounds based on the candidate's bit length (per FIPS 186-4 Appendix C.3 Table C.1). Deno's Rust implementation had no equivalent fallback, so count = 0 meant "skip the loop entirely."

Affected APIs

  • crypto.checkPrime(candidate) (callback form, default options)
  • crypto.checkPrime(candidate, { checks: 0 }, callback)
  • crypto.checkPrimeSync(candidate) (default options)
  • crypto.checkPrimeSync(candidate, { checks: 0 })

Callers who explicitly passed checks >= 1 were less affected, the loop ran the number of rounds they asked for, but were still receiving fewer rounds than Node would have applied for the same bit length. With the patched version they get at least the FIPS minimum.

Not affected

  • Deno's prime generation (crypto.generatePrime, crypto.generatePrimeSync, and the DH parameter generation path). Those routes go through Prime::generate_with_options in ext/node_crypto/primes.rs, which hardcodes 20 Miller-Rabin rounds and never reads a user-controlled checks value, so the bug never reached them.
  • Any other Deno-internal use of primality testing — is_probably_prime is not called from elsewhere in the runtime with count = 0.
  • Web Crypto (crypto.subtle.*), which uses entirely separate code paths and does not expose a primality test.

Impact

The realistic exposure is application-level: a Deno program that calls crypto.checkPrime (or its sync variant) with default options to validate an externally-supplied bignum, for example checking a peer-provided Diffie-Hellman prime, validating a prime read from configuration, or sanity-checking an RSA factor, will accept crafted composites as prime. The composite is trivial to construct: any product of two primes greater than 17,863 works.

Downstream consequences depend on what the program does with the "verified" prime. If the prime is fed into a key exchange, signature verification, or factorization-style check, the security guarantees of that protocol collapse to whatever the attacker engineered into the composite.

The CVSS impact is bounded by the requirement that the victim application both (a) calls checkPrime with default options and (b) acts on the result for security-relevant input it does not control.

Reproduction

import { checkPrimeSync } from "node:crypto";

// 17881 and 17891 are both prime and both above the trial-division
// ceiling used by Deno's implementation.
const composite = 17881n * 17891n;

// Affected versions print `true`; the patched version prints `false`.
console.log(checkPrimeSync(composite));

The same result is reproducible from Rust against the internal helper:

use num_bigint::BigInt;
let composite = BigInt::from(17881u32) * BigInt::from(17891u32);
assert!(!is_probably_prime(&composite, 0)); // fails on affected versions

Fix

PR #34391 introduces a
helper min_miller_rabin_rounds_for_bits(bits) that returns the FIPS
186-4 Appendix C.3 round counts, matching the defaults OpenSSL uses
inside BN_check_prime. is_probably_prime then clamps the loop bound
to count.max(min_miller_rabin_rounds_for_bits(n.bits())). The
probabilistic loop now always executes, regardless of what checks
value the caller supplied, with a round count strong enough to keep the
false-positive probability below 2^-80. Callers that pass a larger
explicit checks still get exactly that many rounds.

Unit tests under ext/node_crypto/primes.rs cover the
17,881 × 17,891 case, a larger 64-bit composite, and the FIPS lookup
table itself.

Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade immediately:

  • Pass an explicit checks value when calling crypto.checkPrime or crypto.checkPrimeSync. A value of 64 is conservative for any reasonable bit length and keeps the loop running.
  • Do not rely on crypto.checkPrime to validate attacker-influenced bignums in security-critical paths until you are on the patched release.

References

@bartlomieju bartlomieju published to denoland/deno May 27, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jun 16, 2026
Reviewed Jun 16, 2026
Last updated Jun 16, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(5th percentile)

Weaknesses

Missing Cryptographic Step

The product does not implement a required step in a cryptographic algorithm, resulting in weaker encryption than advertised by the algorithm. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-49440

GHSA ID

GHSA-9xg4-qhm4-g43w

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.