[detection-analysis] Detection Analysis Report — 2026-06-28 (last 24h) #42093
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Detection Analysis Report. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #42263. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Summary
2026-06-28T10:39:48Z→2026-06-28T12:57:13ZNote
No workflow misconfigurations were detected against the four criteria. However, one data caveat applies: the documented
features.gh-aw-detectionflag was absent from everyaw_info.jsonin this window. Detection status was therefore derived from the presence of adetectionjob in each run'sjob_details(the actual signal available). See Recommendations.Comparison Chart
* Token usage was not populated in the downloaded run summaries for this window (
TokenUsage = 0across all 45 runs), so token averages are reported as unavailable rather than zero-by-fact.The 5 detection-run failures (Avenger ×3, Daily Max AI Credits Test (Intentionally Fails) ×1, PR Code Quality Reviewer ×1) all had their detection job conclude
success— the run-level failures originate in the agent/safe-output stages, not in detection. One of those (Intentionally Fails) is a deliberate test workflow.Misconfigured Workflows
No misconfigured workflows detected in this window.
falseon active workflow (>3 runs/7d)falsesuccessThe only workflow lacking a detection job is Smoke CI (3/3 runs, all
success,copilotengine). It does not match any misconfiguration criterion: it is a CI smoke test (not an audit/report name), has no explicitfalseflag, runs ≤3 times, and is consistently detection-off. Flagged here as an observation, not a misconfiguration.View All Run Metrics
View Historical Trend
Trend chart skipped: only 2 days of history are stored in
cache-memory/trending/detection-metrics/history.jsonl(yesterday + today); the trend chart requires ≥7 days. Today's data point was appended for future runs.The jump from 0 → 42 detection runs reflects the detection job now being present in nearly all workflows.
Recommendations
features.gh-aw-detectioninaw_info.json. The documented metadata field that this analysis is meant to read does not exist in any run. Classification currently relies on indirectly observing adetectionjob injob_details. Emitting the explicit flag would make detection state unambiguous and machine-checkable.TokenUsagewas0for all 45 runs, blocking the token-comparison metric. Verify the summary pipeline capturestoken_usage.jsonlintorun_summary.json.gh-aw-detection: true; otherwise no action needed.References:
Warning
Firewall blocked 1 domain
The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:
awmgmcpgSee Network Configuration for more information.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions